billpapa.org Reading (b)log

Reading (b)log of researcher Bill Papantoniou

About

Notes on papers, books and blogs about Cognitive Ergonomics, HCI, philosophy of design and everything interesting

In an interesting lecture, Don Norman extended his human action cycle model, by including a second “intelligent” machine action cycle. This gives rise to three new gaps:

  • Goal Gap: Goals of Machine and Person can be different
  • Action Gap: The actions taken (or want to undertake)
  • Knowledge Gap: Machine and Person don’t know the same things

Norman being -a good popularizer- avoids explicitly using Distributed Cognition or ANT: this leads to a weaker model (I cannot imagine an analyses using it). But as a simplified notion it is an excellent teaching tool that communicates these notions, especially to designers.

References

Norman, Don February 9, 2007 .The Design of Future Things: Cautious Cars and Cantankerous Kitchens. Don Norman, Northwestern University and Nielsen-Norman Group

Soegaard, Mads (2003). Interaction-Design.org Encyclopedia: Gulf of Evaluation and Gulf of Execution. Retrieved March 17, 2007 from Interaction-Design.org: http://www.interaction-design.org/encyclopedia/gulf_of_evaluation_and_gulf_of_execution.html

technorati tags:, ,

One Response to “Norman and Autonomous Agents”

  1. […] An interesting alternative explanation closer to my line of work is the one highlighted by Norman (see also the recent post): The goals of human and intelligent system were conflicting. The inelligent system is another […]

    billpapa.org Reading (b)log » Blog Archive » Complexity Science in Sociotechnical Systems

Leave a Reply